Dear Friend,

I have received numerous questions about my vote regarding a permanent change to the Hoboken’s I-1 zoning districts. I would like to take this opportunity to explain my position and my reason for voting against the zoning change.

At the last City Council meeting several of my colleagues on the council proposed a permanent change to I-1 zoning districts to allow animal daycare and boarding as a “conforming use”. If the change is enacted it allows an animal daycare and boarding facility to open anywhere in an I-1 zone and prohibits the city from regulating the business.

A designation of an I-1 zone is supposed to be reserved for “light industrial areas” and not included any residential neighborhoods, but with the proposed change it would in fact encompass many residential neighborhoods.

Currently there is a business owner who wishes to move his doggie daycare and boarding business to an area that is not zoned as an I-1. While this business would not be located in a residential area and would not be of any disturbance to residents in its new location, I do believe there is alternate relief available for the business owner.

The business owner can simply go before the Zoning Board of Adjustments to receive a use variance. I have always supported Hoboken business owners and would gladly support Mr. Stigliano’s application for a use variance before the zoning board and ask that residents join me in doing the same.

Many residents of our community are dog owners and Mr. Stigliano’s business allows them a place to bring their pet for quality care while they are out of town. As an animal lover myself, I know that peace of mind is important when you are away from a pet while traveling on vacation or on business trips. Mr. Stigliano’s business is of great service to the community in this regard and I whole heartedly support it.

For far too long city government has passed ordinances for a benefit today without thinking about how it will effect residents long term. It would be egregious for the City Council to continue this practice, which is why I believe a use variance is a better approach than a zoning change. I hope this helps you to better understand my vote.

Thank you for your time,